fbpx
April Continental Champs Info:
European | Asian | Pan American | African
Home Articles Weightlifting Fraud

Weightlifting Fraud

Yesterday I sat in the park listening to the Commissioners of Power podcast as they interviewed one of my favourite athletes, one who I have had the privilege of training with, Donny Shankle.

Anyone who has listened to Donny speak understands not only how motivating he can be, but how crystal clear and simple he can make the process of weightlifting seem. He strips away the waffle- where my hands should be, how many reps should I do at this weight, what stretches should I do? He replaces them with a few of his weightlifting truths.

1) Push the maximum often
2) Create a team environment
3) Recover

This is essentially his system, one that was learnt over time by his coaches, including the late Ivan Abadjiev. As a system it seems almost romantically perfect to me. Turn up, try and set records, try and beat everyone else, go home, eat and sleep as much as you can, and then do it again. How perfect and simple.

My issue stems from having spent too much of my life studying the science of training. Learning about periodisation, understanding maximum and minimum recoverable volumes, reading about the stages of fatigue, reading all the old soviet texts which are so heavily focused on exact %s, rep schemes, and varying exercise selection.

I love that approach to weightlifting. I love having everything calculated perfectly. It brings out a confidence in me. The logic being that if I can make myself hit every repetition, never skip a set or an exercise, monitor my fatigue, and build up my strength through various points of focus, then I can excel.

But I also love the idea of brute force. Forcing myself to lift more and more every day through maximum attempts and a competitive team atmosphere. Banging my head against a wall until I break through, only to be met by another wall and doing it all over again. In training the more max attempts you take, the more team mates play a role. When everyone is lifting at 80%, some sort of competitiveness is lost. Of course you can try and make more reps than the other person, but something about trying to lift more weight than the next person brings out high levels of performance that are so often lost in a sport that requires performance.

As a result of these two parts of my mind, I feel somewhat like a fraud. Sometimes I tell people that they need a more systematic approach, and other times that they just need to push for max attempts more and force adaptation to occur that way.  But which is it?

In an ideal world I would train with the best team mates and push for max attempts every day. I find this type of training fits best with my personality. Something about competing every day with a bunch of guys really brings out the best in me. But I fear that I need some structure too. Something that satisfies the nerdier side of me. The side that enjoys things being laid out perfectly, a carefully interwoven program of exactness.

I host a podcast with Glenn Pendlay, I’m on his online team, and so it may come as no surprise that it is his programming I choose to follow. The reason is because I buy into it. I buy into everything that he programs. It is because of that that I believe it works. If you do not believe in it, you will probably fail it. You will fail it because you won’t be able to push hard enough to complete the squats because you hold some hesitation towards their necessity. You may fail because you don’t see the point in the accessory work. You may fail because you don’t want to go heavy on the lifts the day after you just deadlifted heavy.

The point is that Glenn’s program fills both parts of my dilemma. The program has enough progression and periodisation in it that I don’t feel myself worrying about growing stagnant or worrying about when the fatigue will ebb and flow. But it also has enough heavy attempts in the snatch and clean and jerk that I feel secure that I am in charge of forcing my body to adapt like Donny said.

So I’m not saying that it is the best program for you. But it is for me. I don’t have to feel like a fraud on this program. I am no longer an undercover Bulgarian lifter completing a Soviet program, nor am I a Soviet lifter testing the waters of the Bulgarian style.

If you fancy it then by all means give it a go, but make sure you are committed to it or it just may not work out for you.

        sebostrowicz
        Seb Ostrowicz
        I am the owner of Weightlifting House. When I'm not working on the site/podcasting/interviewing I spend my time training, coaching, and competing in the sport of Weightlifting.

      • I am a Masters Lifter and I believe in the single bullet theory of training or the chamber empty/full theory. Only so many bullets in the gun. Being a Masters(age 56 yrs) I have a limited recovery system between workouts and also between sets, My endocrine and hormonal systems are obviously not that of a younger lifter. A Masters Lifter has only so much time to really get strong measured in years. I find a modified Bulgarian Method the best for me. Remember, there is a Bulgarian System, multiple workouts per day, and a Bulgarian Method, working up to a daily Max and backing off for a set or two. After warm up in the snatch I go up to Max and try new max a few times, then back off 10-20 KG and do one double. Then I do 1 or 2 warm up sets in the C&J and jump right to max, then try a new max even if only 1 KG more. I do no back off sets on C&J. Finally I do a max front squat and try a new max then back off 10-20 KG for a double. This is done Three times a week for a few weeks then I add a day, usually Saturday, then another day either Tuesday or Thursday until I am lifting 5-6 days a week. At one point I worked out 7 days a week including 2-3 times on Sat. and Sunday. Right now 3-4 days a week seem to work good with my job and other things going on.

        Many of the books I’ve read on Masters Weightlifting are complete rubbish. Foreman’s book is a real sad attempt at a book(I think Foreman and Everett are total posers) and Nappier’s book is too general. The Soviet System by Risto Sports has workouts for Masters that I think are idiotic because the volume is way to high and they claim some chain of knowledge since one of authors trained under a coach with connections to Medeyev. Clearly pompous.
        . For further information on Soviet methods I would read here: http://www.sportivnypress.com/ In fact, Charniga is one of the few people on weightlifting I would listen to in the USA, Read this article: http://www.sportivnypress.com/2018/concerning-the-russian-squat-routine/ Charniga is on a first name basis with many former Soviet Lifters and coaches. I would listen to him before many other pretenders out there.

        I e-mailed Charniga a few years ago about the Bulgarian Method and he said the program worked because it is specific which is in-line with athletic performance theory. The smorgasbord approach, a little of everything is not specific enough to force the body to new higher strength levels. Either the body will respond or it won’t. Using various exercises performed at varying intensity levels when you only do two lifts on the platform is just plain MORONIC.

      • You need to Login or Register to post a comment

        Support Our Site

        Whatever your budget, there is something in our store for you. All sales help us to bring more weightlifting content to you.

        Flag

        $15
        5' x 3' flag for your gym wall.
        USA | Europe

        T-Shirts

        $22
        Range of designs
        USA | Europe

        Book

        $40
        228 full colour pages of photo and stories of the best male weightlifters ever.
        USA | Europe

        Barbell

        $320
        210,000 PSI, IWF Knurling, Needle Bearings
        USA | Europe
        >